On May 27, 2004, Edgar County Judge Dean Andrews
signed the order setting free former death row inmate Gordon "Randy"
Steidl. It took seventeen years to free Steidl, who was convicted
in 1987 of the double homicide of Dyke and Karen Rhoads of Paris,
IL. They were savagely stabbed to death in their beds as they lay
sleeping. The crime occurred at approximately 4 a.m. on July 5,
1986, when neighbors heard a woman scream. A fire was set destroying
evidence of the crime.
|
Randy Steid, left, and his mother Barbara "Bobbie"
Steidl pose with Bill Clutter on his first day of freedom.
|
Steidl, and his co-defendant Herbert Whitlock were convicted based
on perjured testimony of two alcoholics who claimed to have been
eyewitnesses to the murders. Both witnesses denied knowing about
a $25,000 reward that had been circulated in the seedy taverns ringing
the courthouse by a man who at the time was being investigated by
police as a potential suspect for arranging the murders. Steidl
was represented at trial by Charleston, IL attorney John Muller.
Bill Clutter conducted the post-conviction investigation that federal
judge Michael P. McCuskey relied on in granting a habeas petition
filed by Jane Raley, Karen Daniel and Lawrence C. Marshall of the
Bluhm Legal Clinic of the Northwestern University School of Law,
and by Springfield attorneys Michael Metnick and Kathy Saltmarsh.
By April of 1992, Clutter's investigation revealed new evidence
proving that a key prosecution witness, Debra Rienbolt, bore false
witness against both Steidl and Whitlock. This evidence included
forensic evidence proving that a broken lamp discovered by firemen
had been broken after the fire had been suppressed, discrediting
Rienbolt's trial testimony that she saw a broken lamp inside the
bedroom as she witnessed the murders. At trial, Rienbolt testified,
"somebody was holding a piece of it." In closing arguments,
the prosecutor told the jury Rienbolt's knowledge of the broken
lamp made her a "credible witness."
Clutter's investigation determined that the inside of the ceramic
lamp had no soot and was bone white, meaning it had not been broken
until after firemen had suppressed the fire. Blood spatter at the
scene suggests that the lamp had been pulled off the nightstand
by one of the victims. A fireman who entered the bedroom testified
at trial that he found the lamp in the doorway of the bedroom and
he scooted it out of the way and noticed the lamp was broken. Other
firefighters had already entered the room and likely broke the lamp
when they stepped inside.
On June 17, 2003, U.S. District Court Judge Michael P. McCuskey
issued his opinion ordering the State to either release or retry
Steidl. Judge McCuskey determined that Steidl's trial attorney failed
to investigate his defense, and deprived Steidl of his constitutional
right to effective representation of counsel.
Judge McCuskey noted that in 1997, the Illinois Supreme Court determined
that the "evidence in this case was closely balanced"
and "no physical evidence linked [Petitioner] to the crime
scene and [Petitioner] presented an alibi."
Judge McCuskey wrote: "As presented at trial, the lamp was
a significant detail used to bolster Rienbolt's credibility. The
prosecution relied heavily on Rienbolt's supposedly accurate description
of the crime scene to offset her doubtful credibility and the inherently
unbelievable nature of her story . . . Had defense counsel presented
expert testimony showing that Rienbolt's account of seeing a broken
piece of the lamp was flatly inconsistent with the physical evidence
from the crime scene, it would have gone a long way toward convincing
the jury that Rienbolt's trial testimony was not actually an eyewitness
account of the murders. This court concludes that there is a reasonable
probability that scientific refutation of one of the key aspects
of Rienbolt's testimony would have resulted in a different outcome
at trial."
In March of 2000, the Illinois State Police reviewed new evidence
documenting that Darrell Herrington, a second eyewitness who testified
at trial, had received payment of the "reward" money in
exchange for his false testimony against Steidl and Whitlock. The
investigation was assigned to Michale Callahan Zone 5 commander
of investigations. Callahan's investigation also came to the same
conclusion that the testimony presented at trial lacked credibility.
On March 26, 2004, Attorney General Lisa Madigan announced she would
not appeal Judge McCuskey's order. The Office of the State Appellate
Prosecutor's Office then reviewed the case to determine whether
to retry Steidl. Prosecutor David Rands presented the order to Nolle
Pros the case.
December 14, 2005
48
Hours -- Segment to highlight role of UIS Investigating Innocence
in Rhoads murder investigation
Illinois
Times -- Badge of Honor: Veteran trooper Michale Callahan believed
that the Illinois State Police would always do right. He was wrong.
By Dusty Rhodes, August 25, 2005
Illinois
Times -- From death row to hero: How Randy Steidl became the face of capital punishment repeal.
By By Bill Clutter, January 20, 2011
Steidl in Pontiac prison in 1993, with Bill Clutter, then an investigator for Springfield attorney Michael Metnick. PHOTOâBYâGINNY LEE
|